I remember friends all over Facebook posting about saying "NO" to plastic straws and wondering, "why the sudden hype?"
Nas Daily's hot take on the plastic straw dilemma echoed my thoughts. (Linked: Facebook video that I can't embed here.) In short, he points out hypocrisies in the environmental PR policies of some big companies. Specifically,
he criticises McDonalds for banning plastic straws but still using plastic spoons, cup covers, and other disposable plastic;
then goes on to criticise McDonalds for wanting to save turtles, while being responsible for millions of other animals dying every year - pigs, cows... basically, the meat we eat.
He calls this selective empathy.
Meat? Pet?
Selective empathy is when we care about some plastic, some animals, and some humans. Nas concludes that saving one plastic straw is good (Practice the new and improved 5R's! Refuse,Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, Rot.), but caring about the actual problem is even better.
WWF trapped a man indoors for a week and filmed his experience as they introduced pollution, global warming, and habitat loss to his living quarters. (Linked: another Facebook video.) The man, Francis, narrates his experiences, which helps us empathise with the suffering we have brought upon wildlife. The video invites us to empathise with our future too: "But we can't leave the planet."
One critique I have for ContraPoints ("the Oscar Wilde of YouTube") is that (at the risk of catastrophizing) an environmental refugee crisis may eventually lead to Total War.
The last time that happened, someone dropped 2 nuclear bombs somewhere.
Linking climate change to security is a "survivalist" approach in environmental discourse. It may be more effective - more Realistic - than the other approaches identified in Dryzek's book, The politics of the earth: environmental discourses. (The other approaches are environmental governance, sustainability, and activism.)
Environmental discourses defined by Dryzek's taxonomy
A few reasons why I'm restarting this blog:
New Year New Me
Academia can feel alienating from broader concerns
To explore a wider range of environmental discourses than my thesis. "Alternative theses", if you will. (A. Hansen, 2018)
Engage in discussion and debate with readers
A few principles I'll blog by:
Short and sweet
Keep things light
Link to other content creators - there's so much information out there already
Catalogue resources - tags
Document personal communication - I've spoken with so many people about environmental issues, it's a shame our conversations don't have a wider reach